Analysis Of Searle s The Chinese Room Argument Essay

Searle’s, The Chinese Room Argument, asks, if a computer can use data to output answers does that computer understand? In Searle’s experiment, he acts as a computer and is given translations of Chinese symbols. He states that even though he can find the appropriate translations for the symbols and output answers he still does not understand Chinese. Prior to my previous argument, I look to investigate in what instance can the computer be thought of as an understanding machine. In order to do this, I must investigate the following: what are the components necessary for understanding, why humans are thought of as understanding beings, and can we duplicate such things in a machine. The Chinese Room experiment is extremely basic, but given more inputs, can the computer think beyond its coded formulas. Searle concludes that Strong AI is not independent intelligence, that it is just simulation of intelligence, and although machines can act highly intelligent what separates th em from humans is the notion of intentionality. Humans who are seen as having the ability to form representations, do so through experience. But what is it about the formation of experience that cannot be duplicated and why is it necessary to have such systems in place to be deemed an intelligent, understanding, and a thinking being. Firstly, we must dissect the meaning of understanding. Understanding, is given numerous definitions. One in particular stands out as relevant to what we as humans undergo, â€Å"theShow MoreRelatedExploring the Different Theories Involved in the Mind and Body Problem1654 Words   |  7 Pagesproblem. One supporter of Dualism is David Chalmers He says â€Å"Human kind has grown up with dualism, we are all naturally dualists: the mechanistic basis of our thoughts is invisible to our introspection and casual powers of observation†. Arguments against dualism have been provided on the basis of both empirical evidence and on philosophical grounds, and clearly express the predominant view (Dennett, Damasio, Churchland). One of the ways in answering or avoiding the â€Å"problemRead MoreThe Critical And Conceptual Inquiry2264 Words   |  10 Pages In the early 1950’s, Ludwig Wittgenstein (1953) openly condemned psychology as a discipline plagued with conceptual confusion, and rife with experimental methods that are often completely irrelevant to the problems they set out to solve. Although written over half a century ago, Wittgenstein’s criticism actively reflects the distinct conundrum of modern day psychology, in which expeditious empirical expansion is coupled with conceptual and theoretical turmoil (Hacker, 2007). Despite this ambiguityRead MoreHbr When Your Core Business Is Dying74686 Words   |  299 Pagesneed, especially in , supply disruptions, nat ural disasters, and unstable regimes? True global energy sec urity will be a result of cooperation and engage ment, not isolationism When investment and . expertise are allowed to flow freely across border s, the engine of innovation is ignited, prosperity is fueled and the energy available to everyone inc reases. At the same tim balancing the needs of e, pro ducers and consum ers is as crucial as increa sing supply and curbin g demand. Only then wil l theRead MoreContemporary Issues in Management Accounting211377 Words   |  846 Pagesproviding a voice of reason amidst all the consultancy excitement of seemingly new ways of costing the business world. He has played a similar role in the area of accounting standard setting, both taking forward the British tradition of the economic analysis of financial accounting and, of possibly greater significance, providing some very original analyses of the possibilities for meaningful accounting standardization. With an agenda as rich as this, it is all the more praiseworthy that Michael maintained